The Application of Civil Forfeiture as a Restorative Mechanism in Returning State Financial Losses due to Corruption Crime
Abstract
Corruption crimes not only result in massive state financial losses but also create inequality of justice and weaken the effectiveness of the legal system. The recovery of state losses has so far relied on a criminal approach that is repressive and limited to court decisions, so that it is unable to reach conditions when the perpetrator escapes, dies, or cannot be brought to trial. This article examines the application of civil forfeiture as a restorative mechanism oriented towards direct asset recovery without requiring proof of criminal guilt. Through a normative juridical research method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches, this research analyzes the practice of non-conviction-based asset forfeiture in civil law countries such as France as well as common law countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom. The results of the analysis show that the civil forfeiture mechanism is in line with the principles of restorative justice and can be applied in Indonesia through regulatory reforms that guarantee legal certainty and protection of human rights. The application of an in rem- based asset forfeiture scheme with limited reversal of the burden of proof is considered capable of accelerating the return of state losses while strengthening the eradication of corruption in a sustainable manner.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aldino, M. R., & Susanti, E. (2025). The Urgency Of Regulation Of Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture In Corruption Criminal Acts In Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Sehasen. https://jurnal.unived.ac.id/index.php/jhs/article/view/7630/5591
Boucht, J. (2014). Civil Asset Forfeiture and the Presumption of Innocence under Article 6(2) Echr. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441400500206
CNN Indonesia, C. I. (2025). Kilas Balik Kasus e-KTP Paulus Tannos yang Ditangkap di Singapura Baca artikel CNN Indonesia “Kilas Balik Kasus e-KTP Paulus Tannos yang Ditangkap di Singapura.” CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20250124141801-12-1191101/kilas-balik-kasus-e-ktp-paulus-tannos-yang-ditangkap-di-singapura
Dalimunthe, J. S. (2020). PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA MELALUI PERAMPASAN ASET HASIL TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 1(2).
Department of Justice, D. of J. (2025). Asset Forfeiture Policy Manual 2025. Department of Justice.
Edison, H. (2023). REKONSTRUKSI REGULASI PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI BERBASIS NILAI KEADILAN [Disertasi, UNIVERSITAS ISLAM SULTAN AGUNG]. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/30956/
Endraswari, A. A. M. (2016). PENERAPAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK DALAM PERAMPASAN ILLICIT ENRICHMENT KAITANNYA DENGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 5(2), 392. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2016.v05.i02.p13
GOV UK, G. U. (2024). Asset recovery statistical bulletin: Financial years ending 2019 to 2024. Asset Recovery Statistical Bulletin: Financial Years Ending 2019 to 2024. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office.
Hamonangan, A. R. H., Sibuea, H. P., Saimima, I. D. S., & Hasibuan, E. S. (2024). Peniadaan Pemidanaan Terhadap Perbuatan yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Negara dalam Kegiatan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa di Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(3).
Harahap, Yahya. (2006). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. Sinar Grafika.
KPK, K. (2024). Laporan Tahunan KPK 2022-2024.
Mahmud, A. (2017). DINAMIKA PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 3(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v3i2.216
Mahmud, A. (2020). URGENSI PENEGAKAN HUKUM PROGRESIF UNTUK MENGEMBALIKAN KERUGIAN NEGARA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(1), 256–271.
Mamesah, C. N., Senewe, E. V. T., & Lengkong, N. L. (2024). PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP KASUS KORUPSI SEBAGAI IMPLEMENTASI THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION (UNCAC) DI INDONESIA. Lex Privatum, 14(3). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/58333
Rifai H, S. A., Sihombing, E. N., & Zulyadi, R. (2025). Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 5(3), 976–984.
Sakinah, T. I., & Sumardiana, B. (2025). Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Policy Concept Through In Rem Lawsuit Based on Economic Analysis of Law. Reformasi Hukum, 29(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v29i1.1154
Sebastian, S. (2021). Kebijakan Penyelamatan Keuangan Negara Dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Progresif [Thesis]. Universitas Surabaya.
Septiana, P. T., & Afifah, W. (2022). CIVIL FORFEITURE SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN NEGARA PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 2(3), 612–623. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.52
Sonora Gokma, P., & Nelson, F. M. (2023). Strategi Pemulihan Aset (Asset Recovery) Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Tindak Pidana: Ditinjau Dari Analisis Ekonomi Terhadap Hukum (Economic Analysis of Law) [Tesis]. Universitas Indonesia.
TEMPO, T. (2025a). Kronologi Kasus Buron Paulus Tannos dan Korupsi e-KTP [TEMPO.COM]. TEMPO.COM. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/kronologi-kasus-buron-paulus-tannos-dan-korupsi-e-ktp-1199341
TEMPO, T. (2025b, January 24). Kabur Sejak 2019, Begini Perjalanan Paulus Tannos Hingga Ditangkap KPK di Singapura [TEMPO.COM]. TEMPO.COM. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/kabur-sejak-2019-begini-perjalanan-paulus-tannos-hingga-ditangkap-kpk-di-singapura-1198580
Wantra, I. M., Istri Dian Laksmi Dewi, C., & Putu Sucana Aryana, I. W. (2025). Telaah Pengembalian Aset Hasil Kejahatan Korupsi Melalui Konsep Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Pemulihan Kerugian Negara. Jurnal sosial dan sains, 5(3), 522–532. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsosains.v5i3.32083
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jkp.v16i2.8806
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Kebijakan Publik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.