RESISTANSI PENGEMUDI OJEK ONLINE TERHADAP CELAH HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN
Abstract
Hubungan industrial antara perusahaan aplikasi dan pengemudi ojek online di Indonesia dirumuskan secara kontraktual sebagai kemitraan. Pendefinisian pengemudi sebagai “mitra” alih-alih “pekerja” dalam kemitraan dimanfaatkan oleh perusahaan untuk menghindari kewajiban memberikan hak dasar dan jaminan sosial pekerja. Ketimpangan relasi terlihat dari otoritas penuh perusahaan untuk mengatur tarif dasar, mengontrol pembagian keuntungan, hingga memutus kemitraan secara sepihak. Dalam merespons kondisi kerja eksploitatif tersebut, sejumlah pengemudi justru mempraktikkan “kemitraan ganda”, yaitu bermitra dengan lebih dari satu perusahaan secara bersamaan. Sebagai analisis politik produksi, riset ini menelaah praktik kemitraan ganda dengan menggunakan teori gamifikasi kerja yang menjelaskan bahwa pekerja dirancang untuk abai terhadap realitas kondisi kerja melalui internalisasi persepsi terhadap kerja yang menyenangkan serta memberikan nilai tambah. Berdasarkan data yang diperoleh melalui studi pustaka dan wawancara terhadap pengemudi di Kota Depok, tulisan ini berargumentasi bahwa praktik kemitraan ganda merupakan upaya resistansi individualistis dari pengemudi untuk menyiasati kerentanan kerja akibat celah regulasi kemitraan dalam rangka memenuhi kebutuhan sosial-ekonomi. Rendahnya kompetensi yang dibutuhkan untuk bekerja sebagai pengemudi dan bonus insentif yang disediakan oleh sistem kerja ojek online melalui gamifikasi menjadi alasan kuat bagi pengemudi untuk bertahan dengan profesinya. Tulisan ini menggarisbawahi pentingnya peran negara dalam mengatasi masalah kerentanan kerja pengemudi ojek online melalui harmonisasi hukum ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Adams-Prassl, A., & Adams-Prassl, J. (2020). Systemic unfairness, access to justice and futility: A framework. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40(3), 561—590, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa017
Avram, S. (2022). Unstable jobs and time out of work: evidence from the UK. Socio-Economic Review, 20(3) 1151—1171. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwac013
Barratt, T., Goods, C., & Veen, K. (2020). ‘I’m my own boss…’: Active intermediation and ‘entrepreneurial’ worker agency in the Australian gig-economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(8), 1643—1661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20914346
Boskamp, E. (2022, September 28). 25 Gamification Statistics. Zippia. https://www.zippia.com/advice/gamification-statistics/
Bryman, A. (2014). Social research methods (4th edition). Oxford University Press.
Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labour process under monopoly capitalism. The University of Chicago Press.
Cameron, L. D. (2021a). “Making out” while driving: Relational and efficiency games in the gig economy. Organization Science, 33(1), 231—252. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1547
Cameron, L. D., & Rahman, H. (2021b). Expanding the locus of resistance: Understanding the co-constitution of control and resistance in the gig economy. Organization Science, 33(1), 38—58. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1557
Cameron, L. D., Thomason, B., & Conzon, V. M. (2021c). Risky business: Gig workers and the navigation of ideal worker expectations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(12), 1821—1833. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000993
Colley, J. (2022, June 7). Gig economy: ride-hailing and takeaway firms may not survive the cost of living crisis. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/gig-economy-ride-hailing-and-takeaway-firms-may-not-survive-the-cost-of-living-crisis-184581
Colling, T. (2003). Managing without unions: The sources and limitations of individualism. In P. Edwards (Ed.) Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice (368—391). Blackwell Publishing.
De Oliveira, R. C. (2021). Gamification and uberized work in application companies. Revista de Administração de Empresas (Journal of Business Management), 61(4), 1—10. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020210407x
De Ruyter, A., & Rachmawati, R. (2020). Understanding the working conditions of gig workers and decent work: Evidence from Indonesia’s online ojek riders. Sozialpolitik, 2(2.4), 1—16. http://doi.org/10.18753/2297-8224-159
Fathikhah, R. A., & Sidik, A. N. (2020). Informalisasi kerja di era platformisasi: Kesejahteraan yang samar dan terbatasnya kebijakan ketenagakerjaan. In A. M. Pratiwi (Ed.), Ekonomi Informal di Indonesia: Tinjauan Kritis Kebijakan Ketenagakerjaan (189—210). Trade Union Rights Centre.
Ferrer-Conill, R. (2018). Playbour and the gamification of work: Empowerment, exploitation and fun as labour dynamics. In P. Bilić, J. Primorac, B. Valtýsson (Eds.), Technologies of Labour and the Politics of Contradiction (193—210). Palgrave Macmillan.
Ford, M., & Honan, V. (2019). The limits of mutual aid: Emerging forms of collectivity among app-based transport workers in Indonesia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 528—548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619839428
Gandini, A. (2019). Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations, 72(6), 1039—1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718790002
Gaskell, A. (2022, May 16). How Gig Workers Strive To Exert Some Control Over Their Work. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/adigaskell/2022/05/16/how-gig-workers-strive-to-exert-some-control-over-their-work
Gerdenitsch, C., Sellitsch, D., Besser, M., Burger, S., Stegmann, C., Tscheligi, M., & Kriglstein, S. (2020). Work gamification: Effects on enjoyment, productivity and the role of leadership. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 43, 1—11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100994
Glynos, J. (2008). Ideological fantasy at work. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(3), 275—296. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310802376961
Grab. (2021, June 25). Kode etik mitra. https://www.grab.com/id/kodeetik/
Guest, D. (2008). Worker well-being. In P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito, E. Heery (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Industrial Relations (529—547). SAGE Publications.
Gumiwang, R. (2018, November 16). Go-Jek sambut pengemudi Grab yang membuat dua akun. Tirto. https://tirto.id/go-jek-sambut-pengemudi-grab-yang-membuat-dua-akun-dabl
Hao, K., & Freischlad, N. (2022, April 21). The gig workers fighting back against the algorithms. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/21/1050381/the-gig-workers-fighting-back-against-the-algorithms/
Izzati, F. F., Larasati, R. S., Laksana, B. K. C., Apinino, R., & Azali, K. (2021). Pekerja industri kreatif Indonesia: Flexploitation, kerentanan dan sulitnya berserikat. SINDIKASI & FNV Mondiaal.
Izzati, N. R., & Sesunan, M. M. G. (2022). ‘Misclassified partnership’ and the impact of legal loophole on workers. Bestuur, 10(1), 57—67. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v10i1.62066
Kim, T. W. (2018). Gamification of labour and the charge of exploitation. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 27—39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3304-6
Koonse, T., Herrera, L., Waheed, S., Shadduck-Hernández, J., Gonzalez-Vasquez, A. L., & Flowers, K. (2021). More than a gig? Ride-hailing in Los Angeles county. In B. Dolber, M. Rodino-Colocino, C. Kumanyika, T. Wolfson (Eds.) The Gig Economy: Workers and Media in the Age of Convergence (34—46). Routledge.
Kost, D., Fieseler, C., & Wong, S. I. (2019). Boundaryless careers in the gig economy: An oxymoron? Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 100—113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12265
Maffie, M. D. (2020). Are we ‘sharing’ or ‘gig‐ing’? A classification system for online platforms. Industrial Relations Journal, 51(6), 536—555. https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12312
Meiwanda, G. (2018). Konsensus Antara Pemerintah, Perusahaan, dan Pekerja Dalam Masalah Ketenagakerjaan. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 9(1), 53—60.
Melati, M., & Zulkarnaini, H. (2021). Efektivitas Program Bantuan Sosial Tunai Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Kelurahan Pasir Pengaraian. Journal Publicuho, 4(1), 19.
Merkel, J. (2018). ‘Freelance isn’t free.’ Co-working as a critical urban practice to cope with informality in creative labour markets. Urban Studies, 56(3), 526—547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018782374
Miklós, A. (2019). Exploiting injustice in mutually beneficial market exchange: The case of sweatshop labour. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(1), 59—69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3574-7
Muhammad, D. Y., Roospita, R. A., & Nugraheni, N. A. (2021). Mitos kemitraan dan konstruksi normalitas kerja gig: Kajian operasi kekuasaan hegemonik. In Y. T. Keban, A. Hernawan, A. Novianto (Eds.), Menyoal Kerja Layak dan Adil dalam Ekonomi Gig di Indonesia (157—173). IGPA Press.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th edition). Pearson.
Novianto, A. (2022). Mengurai persoalan tarif murah bagi pengemudi online di Indonesia: Dari tarif layanan antar penumpang, barang, dan makanan. Insight, 3(1), 1—26.
Permana, M. Y. (2022, October 6). Trapped in the gig economy: What is the exit strategy? Lessons learned from Jakarta. LSE Southeast Asia Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/seac/2022/10/06/trapped-in-the-gig-economy-what-is-the-exit-strategy-lessons-learned-from-jakarta/
Rachmawati, R., Safitri., Zakia, L., Lupita, L., & De Ruyter, A. (2021). Urban gig workers in Indonesia during COVID-19: The experience of online ‘ojek’ drivers. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 15(1), 31—45. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.15.1.0031
Ro, C. (2022, March 9). Why gig work is so hard to regulate. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/ worklife/article/20220308-why-gig-work-is-so-hard-to-regulate
Van Evera, S. (1997). Guide to methods for students of political science. Cornell University Press.
Wicaksono, D. A. (2020). Gamifikasi sistem kerja dan siasat pengemudi Gojek. Calathu: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(2), 132—144.
Wood, A. J., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2021). Antagonism beyond employment: how the ‘subordinated agency’ of labour platforms generates conflict in the remote gig economy. Socio-Economic Review, 19(4), 1369—1396. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab016
Woodcock, J., & Johnson, M. R. (2018). Gamification: What it is, and how to fight it. The Sociological Review, 66(3), 542—558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026117728620
Zulfiyan, A. (2020). Legal protection for women drivers in the gig economy: evidence from Tulungagung, East Java. Brawijaya Law Journal, 7(2), 213—224. https://doi.org/10. 21776/ub.blj.2020.007.02.05
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jkp.v14i1.8212
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Kebijakan Publik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.