SIGNIFIKANSI PERUBAHAN SIKAP PERILAKU (BEHAVIOR) DALAM PROSES KEDIKLATAN

Ahmad Fauzi

Abstract


Telah banyak dana yang dikeluarkan pemerintah untuk sejumlah proses kediklatan,namun outcomes yang dihasilkan belum mampu menjawab perubahan perilaku aparatur ke arahyang lebih baik. Tulisan ini menyorot perilaku aparatur setelah mengikuti diklat, belum sepenuhnyaterjadi perubahan sikap yang esensial seperti peningkatan nilai kejujuran, komitmen, dan etika.Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa agar penyelenggaraan diklat aparatur dapat memberi maknayang lebih baik dan efektif sebagai hasil pembelajaran, maka diperlukan (1) komitmen pimpinanuntuk taat azas dalam penyelenggaraan diklat, (2) kurikulum yang didesain harus merupakankebutuhan (need) para peserta dan bobot perubahan perilaku lebih banyak diarahkan kepadaranah afektif, dan 3) berikan reward and punishment kepada aparatur sesuai dengan perilakunya.Kata kunci: perilaku aparatur, DIklat, komitmen, reard and punishment

Keywords


Perilaku Aparatur, Diklat, Komitmen, Reward and Punishment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Argyris, C. & Schon, D. A. 1996. Organizational Learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Cross, K. P. 1981. Adults as learners: Increasing participation and facilitating learning. California: Jossey-Bass.

Day, N. 1998. “Informal learning gets results.” Workforce June: 31-36.

GTZ/USAID-CLEAN URBAN. 2001. Capacity building for local governance: A framework for government action and donor support (Final Report). Jakarta, GTZ, USAIDClean Urban: 1-64.

Krebs, V. 1998. Knowledge networks: Mapping and measuring knowledge creation and reuse [Online]. Available: http://www. orgnet.com/IHRIM.html [29 August 2001].

Kusterer, K. C. 1978. Know-How on the job: The important working knowledge of “unskilled” workers. Colorado: Westview Press.

Leslie, B., Aring, M. K. & Brand, B. 1997. “Informal learning: The new frontier of employee and organizational development.” Economic Development Review 15(4): 12-18. Low, A., Tjongarero, A.,

Low, A. & Nambundunga, B. 2001. “Donor support to human resource capacity building in Namibia: Experience of resident technical assisnatce support for workplace learning and assessment of alternative options.” Journal of International Development 13: 269- 285.

Mergel, B. 1998. Instructional Design & Learning Theory [Online]. Available: http:/ /www.usask.ca/education/coursework/ 802papers/mergel/mergel.PDF [25 March 2003].

Nidumolu, S. R., Subramani, M. & Aldrich, A. 2001. “Situated learning and the situated knowledge web: Exploring the ground beneath knowledge management.” Journal of Management Information Systems 18(1): 115-150.

Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledgecreating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Polanyi, M. 1967. The tacit dimention. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jkp.v11i1.7889

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Kebijakan Publik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.